A staggering 90% of workers aged 40 and older report experiencing ageism in the workplace, according to a recent survey. Despite their wealth of experience and valuable contributions, older employees frequently face subtle and overt biases that hinder their careers and erode their well-being. This alarming statistic underscores the urgent need to confront and address age discrimination in modern workplaces.
I’m Ty Hyderally, an experienced employment lawyer based in New York and New Jersey. My firm, Hyderally & Associates, and I see the real-world consequences of age discrimination on a regular basis. My practice focuses on advocating for fairness and inclusivity, ensuring that all workers, regardless of age, are treated with the respect they deserve.
Age discrimination involves treating an applicant or employee unfairly based on their age. It frequently appears in hiring decisions, promotion opportunities, and workplace dynamics. Biases against older employees often lead to their exclusion from critical roles, lower pay for equivalent work, or being overlooked for professional development opportunities.
Consider the experience of Liz Jones (name changed for privacy), a 63-year-old HR leader in New Jersey. Despite two decades of service, she was excluded from meetings and denied opportunities typically offered to her peers. Eventually, her position was eliminated. This story, sadly, reflects the broader reality faced by many older employees who are pushed out of their roles under the guise of “restructuring” or cost-cutting measures.
Discrimination during hiring is another major concern. Employers often filter out older candidates, labeling them as “overqualified” or unsuitable for a “fast-paced” team. Moreover, workplace cultures sometimes alienate older employees through dismissive attitudes, exclusion from decision-making, or jokes about age. The survey revealing that 90% of workers over 40 experience ageism highlights the prevalence of these issues, with nearly half of respondents reporting their employers primarily hire younger workers.
Such practices not only harm individuals but also deprive organizations of the invaluable experience, mentorship, and crisis management skills older employees bring to the table. Addressing these biases is crucial for creating a workplace that values employees of all ages.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967 offers critical protections for workers aged 40 and older. This law prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, promotions, compensation, and other employment practices based on age. It also ensures fair treatment in retirement and benefits plans.
Under the ADEA, it is illegal for employers to base employment decisions solely on age or implement policies that disproportionately disadvantage older workers. However, subtle forms of discrimination, such as excluding older employees from important projects or reducing their access to professional growth opportunities, remain widespread. Liz Jones’s experience is a stark example of how these practices can operate under the radar.
While the ADEA is a powerful tool for protecting workers, it has limitations. Smaller employers with fewer than 20 employees are exempt, leaving some workers without recourse. Additionally, age can sometimes be justified as a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) for certain roles. Despite these challenges, the ADEA remains an essential framework for ensuring that age does not become a barrier to fair treatment in the workplace.
For employees who face discrimination, filing a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is an important first step. As someone who has guided many clients through this process, I emphasize the importance of documenting incidents and seeking legal advice early. Workers empowered with the right knowledge and support can hold employers accountable and push for meaningful change.
Despite the existence of strong legal protections, enforcing these rights remains a significant challenge. Many older workers hesitate to report age discrimination out of fear of retaliation or career stagnation. The burden of proof also lies heavily on employees, requiring detailed evidence that age was the primary factor in adverse employment decisions.
Even when employees file claims, the resolution process can be lengthy and emotionally taxing. Unfortunately, this discourages many from pursuing justice, allowing discriminatory practices to persist unchecked. The emotional toll of such experiences, as seen in Liz Jones’s case, often extends far beyond the workplace, affecting self-esteem and personal relationships.
To address these barriers, greater awareness and advocacy are needed. Employers must take proactive steps to create equitable workplaces, while employees should be empowered to speak out against unfair treatment.
Building an age-inclusive workplace benefits both employees and organizations. Employers can take the following steps to address age bias:
For employees experiencing ageism, there are actionable steps to take:
Addressing age discrimination requires a collective effort from employers, policymakers, and employees. Organizations must recognize the immense value older workers bring, from their experience to their mentorship capabilities. Meanwhile, employees must remain vigilant and informed about their rights.
As an experienced employment lawyer, I am committed to fostering fair and inclusive workplaces where employees of all ages can thrive. By challenging biases, enforcing legal protections, and embracing diversity, we can create a workforce that values contributions from every generation. Together, we can ensure that ageism has no place in modern workplaces.
https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/age-discrimination-employment-act-1967
https://www.resume-now.com/job-resources/careers/ageism-in-the-workplace